English- Teacher Certification
Option
Assessment Plan
goals ~ assessment plan ~
results ~ action
Assessments are used at each of the following
decision points:
Entry into certification program
- Teacher Education Candidacy:
- Praxis I
- writing sample
- references from PSU faculty
- 2.5 GPA
Continuation in Certification program
- At the conclusion of the Methods courses
(EN256, EN431, EN455), candidates are assessed in the following
areas:
- Content Knowledge (literature, language, and
writing)
- Pedagogy
- Experience
- Professional Skills
- Collaboration
- Commitment
- Approach to Difference
- Technological Competence
Prior to student teaching
- GPA
- Program approval
- Application
- Interviews with school personnel
Prior to program completion
- Praxis II
- Student Teaching Evaluations/Observations
- Cooperating Teacher and Supervisors
Rubric for Assessment of
Teacher Certification Candidates
Content
Knowledge
Literature
__ Target ____acceptable ___
unacceptable
Target: Candidate has the ability to
confidently and fluently discuss a range of literary works (including
traditional canonical works in the British, American and World
traditions, as well as works by women and minorities) and major genres
and establish connections to contemporary young adult literature and
the issues treated therein.
Acceptable: Candidate has the ability
to discuss a range of literary works in the British, American and
World traditions (including traditional canonical works as well as
works by women and minorities) and major genres and establish
connections to contemporary young adult literature and the issues
treated therein.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Language and Grammar
__ Target ____acceptable ___
unacceptable
Target: Candidate’s oral and written
communication evidences a rich vocabulary. Candidate is able to
communicate orally and in writing in a clear, coherent, and effective
manner. The candidate writes and speaks with a passion for words and
the felicity of language itself.
Acceptable: Candidate communicates in
an effective fashion and conforms to the rules of standard grammar in
more formal situations. The candidate recognizes the importance of
developing vocabulary and actively works to enrich his or her own.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Writing
__ Target ____acceptable ___
unacceptable
Target: Candidate writes eloquently
in a variety of genres and adapts gracefully to different rhetorical
situations.
Acceptable: Candidate writes
effectively in a variety of genres and rhetorical situations.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Pedagogy
(planning and presenting lessons, teaching skills):
__ Target ____acceptable ___ unacceptable
Target: Candidate is able to plan
thoroughly and implement instruction in an imaginative, flexible,
creative manner, utilizing a variety of methods and assessment
techniques (following NH State Frameworks) and with great sensitivity
to student needs.
Acceptable: Candidate is able to plan
and implement lessons that evidence understanding of student needs.
Candidate is able to assess student progress in conjunction with the
NH State Frameworks. Candidate has effective classroom presentation
skills.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Experience (working in classrooms and with adolescents in a variety of
settings):
__ Target ____acceptable ___ unacceptable
Target: Candidate has had experience
working with adolescents (ages 10-18, variety of skill levels,
temperaments, cultural backgrounds) in a variety of settings.
Acceptable: Candidate has had some
experience with adolescents in areas related to education and has
completed the required observation and service hours.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Professional skills (responsibility, ethics, relationships,
boundaries):
__ Target
____acceptable ___ unacceptable
Target: Candidate behaves responsibly
and ethically in all interpersonal situations. Candidate adroitly
maintains the delicate balance and the appropriate boundaries
necessary in the teacher-student relationship.
Acceptable: Candidate demonstrates a
good work ethic and makes reasonable ethical judgments. Candidate
understands the nature of the student-teacher relationships and makes
every effort to conform to acceptable standards in this regard.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Collaboration (ability to work productively with others—both students
and colleagues):
__ Target
____acceptable ___ unacceptable
Target: Candidate collaborates easily
and readily and productively with both colleagues and students.
Candidate also shares ideas and materials and looks to others for
guidance.
Acceptable: Candidate collaborates
when necessary without undue difficulty. Candidate recognizes that
collaboration is a key part of classroom learning.
Unacceptable: Failure to meet
Acceptable Standard.
Commitment (How strongly committed do you feel to teaching as a
profession):
__ Target ____acceptable ___
unacceptable
Target: Candidate consistently seeks
out opportunities for professional involvement, including research,
professional reading, conversations, conferences, and service to the
profession. Candidate lives an active professional life.
Acceptable:
Candidate displays an active interest in the profession evidenced in
some of the ways listed under target category above.
Unacceptable:
Failure to meet Acceptable Standard.
Approach
to Difference: (Ability to deal with diverse populations, respect for
differences, understanding of difference as a positive aspect of life)
target
___ acceptable __ unacceptable __
Target:
Candidate could be described as having attained a level four or better
on the Bennett Scale (attached)—reflecting a respect for difference
and an understanding that cultural differences represent fundamentally
different world views which must be respected, and from which we have
much to learn.
Acceptable:
While the candidate may lack significant experience to put their
understandings of diversity into practice, they have examined their
own cultural beliefs and understand them to be only one of many
possible ways of looking at the world. The candidate is disposed to
work at understanding cultural frameworks different from her own.
Understands culture as a process. categories. Views students from
other cultures as being deprived of the benefits of his or her own
culture. Sees all people as sharing certain fundamental values which
are closely allied with his or her own. Failure to meet acceptable
standard.
Technological Competence (Ability
to understand and use technology to enhance instruction)
target __
acceptable __ unacceptable __
Target:
Candidate effectively and naturally integrates current and emerging
technologies in a thoughtful and appropriate manner, while maintaining
a student-centered approach. Encourage students to responsibly make
use of information and resources available through technological
innovation. Candidate recognizes technology as an important resource
in current pedagogy.
Acceptable: While
candidate may not be entirely comfortable with all forms of
technology, he or she displays a willingness to investigate and
practice use of technology in his or her teaching and learning.
Displays competence with most common classroom technologies.
Unacceptable:
Candidate denigrates technology and actively resists its use.
Failure to meet acceptable standard.
Contents of the Professional Portfolio
1. Resume—this should be up-to-date and
include your student teaching experience. Resumes can be done in
varying forms. Generally, your resume should include education, work
experience, volunteer experience, and experience with people of
diverse backgrounds, presentations, areas of interest, awards and
memberships in professional organizations, activities. (First
submission—EN256; revised EN431, EN455)
2. A presentation of yourself as a
professional—this section should reflect your commitment to the
teaching profession. You should include a statement of your
philosophy of education consistent with current research (many
employers require this). Take an informed stand on issues affecting
the profession. Identify questions related to teaching for
investigation. You could also include summaries of articles, position
papers, and a statement of how your personal philosophy of education
relates to the teaching of reading, literature, language,
communication, and writing. (First submission—EN256; revised EN431,
EN455)
3. A presentation of yourself as a writer—this
section should include examples of published and unpublished work.
Find samples which show the range of your writing, and document how
you use your writing as a teaching tool and as a means of reflecting
on and refining practices. (First submission—EN431)
4. A presentation of yourself as a reader—demonstrate
your own reading predilections and interests and how they relate to
your classroom practice. Your documentation might include the
contents of a personal literature anthology; personal reading logs;
in-class writings; lists of favorite books; formal and informal
responses to literature. You should include evaluations of young
adult literature—how these books contributed to your personal growth,
and how they might do so for your students. Your writings should also
apply various theoretical approaches to literature to specific works
and discuss how the use of literature can increase cultural awareness.
(First submission—EN455)
5. A presentation of yourself as a
practitioner—this section could include a unit plan, lesson plans,
reports of demonstration lessons, photographs or videotapes of
yourself teaching (photographs are especially useful in interviews).
The items you include should show your ability to plan and implement
lessons and to assess learning in conjunction with the New Hampshire
State Frameworks. You should include at least one lesson which
integrates work with another discipline or demonstrates how writing
and/or literature can be integrated into another discipline. (First
submission—EN256)
6. Student responses—this section could
include student work, communications from students, student
evaluations. Again, photographs of scenes in your classroom and
posted student work would be desirable. (First submission—EN431)
7. Reflections—this section should
include your thinking about teaching and learning. You can include
journal entries from your student teaching or tutoring, reports of
observations, and papers, all of which should show your thinking about
what goes on in classrooms, your critique of existing practices, and
your ability to reflect on the moral dimensions of practice. You
should also include observations and other writings which demonstrate
your ability to document students’ growth as writers, readers, and
thinkers. (First submission—EN256; revised EN431, EN455)
8. Other—create an area (if you wish) to
highlight your special areas of interest. Possibilities include
dance, theater, journalism, collaborations, coaching . . .
You must complete a satisfactory, revised and
updated portfolio by the end of the semester. There will be two
revision stages this semester. If, by the time you submit the final
version, you have not made sufficient progress in updating and
revising your portfolio, your grade for the course will be withheld
until you do so.
Each of areas 2-7 should contain a rationale
statement explaining what this area means to you as a teacher and as a
person, along with an explanation of the artifacts (or evidence) which
you chose to include. You should also include your goals in each area
in its respective rationale statement.
Present this material in a hardcover, three-ring
binder from 1-2 inches thick with tab dividers for the different
sections. Make the presentation as visually pleasing as you can,
design a cover and include photographs or illustrations. Feel free to
add other sections which may be more specific to your situation. Keep
the resume first, but you may vary the order of the other sections to
highlight your special strengths.
You should also strongly consider creating a
supplementary CD or web page incorporating these materials (and
more). Employers are definitely impressed by both. |