May 11, 2004

April 12th, 2011 by JJ

11 May 2004

Present: Staples, Fahey, Landry, Thurston, Hage, Mathis, Driscoll, Tinnell, Moore, Sparks.

The minutes from the April 27th meeting were approved as amended.

Richard Sparks gave a report from the FRBC. In efforts to meet their goal of meeting with all academic departments, the committee has so far met with the chairs of four departments; HPER, Business, Library, and Criminal Justice. A fifth is scheduled for Thursday. Discussions involve the department’s hopes, dreams, initiatives, budget, and how the department supports its initiatives (grants, curriculum, etc). The process will continue in the fall. Roger Tinnell hopes for an open forum next year to share the information collected in these meetings with the rest of the faculty. On a related note, Dan Moore hopes that future dept meetings with Ann Thurston will help to repair lack of connection between department activities and their budgets.

Nick wants to see more discussion of what our core values really are. Department chairs are given little guidance in looking to the future. Values have been discussed but only in general terms as evidenced by the mission statement.

Dick Hage noted that there is a perceived need at the top to control the “bottom line”. Conversation is needed with chairs to discuss a framework for what they need. Ideas and creativity should flow up (and down). We need a process for new ideas to be communicated at the very beginning when they are just a seed.

Nick suggested adding a statement to the mission that departments should be encouraged to pursue ideas that take advantage of PSU’s unique natural setting.

Richard noted that next year’s academic theme is the environment. The “greening of campus” is a good topic for this group because conservation is an investment in savings. We cannot conserve without investing. Roger suggested putting this topic at the top of the agenda for next fall, at the start of the environmentally themed year.

Richard wants to see the environmental focus at PSU extend over the next five years. Dick suggested asking Ellen Shippee to identify the projects that related to greening, identify the savings, and prioritize them. Accountability is needed to make sure we are investing wisely for the future.

Also suggested for next year’s agenda was examining the status of projects/suggestions previously approved by this committee. Assessment should be a priority topic.

The possible CLL/PSU merger was very briefly discussed. Where is the faculty input? Depending on the outcome of the current investigation, the merger could be a major topic for the fall.

Featured in Plymouth Magazine

Example Image

Mary Lyon: Stunning at a Century

Mary Lyon Hall, the beloved grande dame of the Plymouth State campus, is celebrating her centennial this year. Over the past century, she’s been renovated, remodeled, updated, and made energy efficient, all while retaining her stately elegance. More than a campus icon, Mary Lyon has been home to generations of students, many of whom have […]

Example Image

And Justice for All

Alisha Medeiros ’15 wants to help troubled youth make better choices and live fulfilling lives. This desire, influenced by a family tragedy, led her to pursue a career in criminal justice.

Example Image

Helping to Heal Broken Hearts

PSU researcher hopes to improve cardiovascular patients’ long-term outcomes » A broken heart and a heart attack may not have very much in common, but they’re both painful in their own way, and both can leave scars. Unlike the scars that follow heartbreak, scars following heart attack don’t fade with time, and they often prove […]