May 11, 2004

April 12th, 2011 by JJ

11 May 2004

Present: Staples, Fahey, Landry, Thurston, Hage, Mathis, Driscoll, Tinnell, Moore, Sparks.

The minutes from the April 27th meeting were approved as amended.

Richard Sparks gave a report from the FRBC. In efforts to meet their goal of meeting with all academic departments, the committee has so far met with the chairs of four departments; HPER, Business, Library, and Criminal Justice. A fifth is scheduled for Thursday. Discussions involve the department’s hopes, dreams, initiatives, budget, and how the department supports its initiatives (grants, curriculum, etc). The process will continue in the fall. Roger Tinnell hopes for an open forum next year to share the information collected in these meetings with the rest of the faculty. On a related note, Dan Moore hopes that future dept meetings with Ann Thurston will help to repair lack of connection between department activities and their budgets.

Nick wants to see more discussion of what our core values really are. Department chairs are given little guidance in looking to the future. Values have been discussed but only in general terms as evidenced by the mission statement.

Dick Hage noted that there is a perceived need at the top to control the “bottom line”. Conversation is needed with chairs to discuss a framework for what they need. Ideas and creativity should flow up (and down). We need a process for new ideas to be communicated at the very beginning when they are just a seed.

Nick suggested adding a statement to the mission that departments should be encouraged to pursue ideas that take advantage of PSU’s unique natural setting.

Richard noted that next year’s academic theme is the environment. The “greening of campus” is a good topic for this group because conservation is an investment in savings. We cannot conserve without investing. Roger suggested putting this topic at the top of the agenda for next fall, at the start of the environmentally themed year.

Richard wants to see the environmental focus at PSU extend over the next five years. Dick suggested asking Ellen Shippee to identify the projects that related to greening, identify the savings, and prioritize them. Accountability is needed to make sure we are investing wisely for the future.

Also suggested for next year’s agenda was examining the status of projects/suggestions previously approved by this committee. Assessment should be a priority topic.

The possible CLL/PSU merger was very briefly discussed. Where is the faculty input? Depending on the outcome of the current investigation, the merger could be a major topic for the fall.

Featured in Plymouth Magazine

Example Image

The Best Job Perk Ever

 An Interview with Donald Hall ■ Diane Jeffrey ’97, Director of the Silver Center for the Arts When I tell people that I am director of PSU’s Silver Center for the Arts, they often say “That sounds like fun!” Not only do I confirm their suspicions, I often tell them about the fascinating people I […]

Example Image

First in the (New) Nation

A Young Man’s Journey from a Nepalese Refugee Camp to the New Hampshire Polls » Southern Bhutan. Early 1990s. Members of an ethnic minority population, the Hindu Lhotshampas, began fleeing rising levels of persecution by the Bhutanese government. Denied their citizenship rights because of religious and cultural differences, the group—more than 100,000 strong—eventually sought protection […]

Example Image

Building a First-Year Class

PSU’s overwhelming success with enrollment for the 2015–16 academic year was the result of focused multi-year investments in admissions, marketing, academic and co-curricular programs, and new and repurposed facilities.